Huddle History

HaiKhuu

AI RecapFrom Verified Stats

DJGG Rules Unbeaten While Huntington Implodes

Week 2 in HaiKhuu delivered a certified massacre, a two-and-a-half point coronary, and a lucky win so undeserved it needed its own award category. DJGG stayed perfect by torching huntington26 for the week's biggest margin, while SounDawg survived a photo finish against an all-play juggernaut who still can't buy a win. djritzjr93 authored the league's loudest week, rocketing ten spots up the power rankings on the back of the week's highest score, while mission909 free-fell eight spots in the opposite direction. Bench decisions across the league ranged from surgical to criminal, and at least one manager benched a healthy Dak Prescott for a running back who scored actual negative points.

Awards of the Week

MVP of the Week

djritzjr93

160.82 pts

Highest scoring team this week

djritzjr93's 160.82 wasn't just the week's best score, it came with a perfect 100% bench efficiency — no wasted ceiling, just pure domination.

LVP of the Week

huntington26

54.56 pts

Lowest scoring team this week

Huntington26's 54.56 points is the kind of score that gets your lineup investigated by the league office.

Blowout of the Week

DJGG

won by 103.68

Demolished huntington26

DJGG's 103.68-point demolition of huntington26 wasn't a matchup, it was a public execution.

Nail Biter

SounDawg

won by 2.30

Survived against omar93

SounDawg survived by 2.30 points, proving that sometimes the difference between glory and heartbreak is one lucky decimal.

Overachiever

Teamwnoname

All-play: 4-7-0

Won their matchup despite a losing all-play record

Teamwnoname won with a 4-7-0 all-play record, which is the fantasy equivalent of winning the lottery with a ticket you found on the ground.

Hard-Luck Loser

omar93

All-play: 8-3-0

Lost their matchup despite a winning all-play record

Omar93's 8-3-0 all-play record says they're one of the best teams in the league, yet here they sit at 1-3 — the math is furious about this one.

Boom

DJGG

42.50 pts from Jaxon Smith-Njigba

Highest individual player score this week

Jaxon Smith-Njigba's 42.50 points single-handedly carried DJGG's blowout and then some.

Bust

Teamwnoname

-0.10 pts from DJ Moore

A starter who completely no-showed

DJ Moore's -0.10 points is a stat line that shouldn't legally be possible for a starter.

Benchwarmer Hero

Teamwnoname

29.76 pts (Dak Prescott on bench)

Outscored a starter who put up -0.10 pts

Teamwnoname left Dak Prescott's 29.76 points on the bench while starting a player who scored negative — a decision that should come with a warning label.

The Matchups

DJGG
158.24
Blowout

DJGG didn't just win, they filed a police report against huntington26, winning by 103.68 in the week's biggest blowout while riding Jaxon Smith-Njigba's 42.50-point boom performance. Meanwhile huntington26 posted the league's lowest score at 54.56 and somehow still left 10 points on the bench they never needed, good for an 84.5% bench efficiency in a game they had zero chance of winning anyway. DJGG, at 99.4% bench efficiency, basically played this one with a calculator instead of a lineup card. Huntington26, 0-4 now, this is what rock bottom with a bench full of regret looks like.

DJGG left 0.98 on the bench (99% of ceiling) · huntington26 left 10.00 on the bench (85% of ceiling)

Lucky Win

Teamwnoname won this one 89.38 to 83.70, but the box score is lying to you — their all-play record sits at a putrid 4-7-0, officially crowning them this week's Overachiever for stealing a win they had no business getting. Both teams left a combined 62.86 points on their benches, with Teamwnoname somehow surviving despite DJ Moore no-showing for -0.10 points while Dak Prescott rotted on the bench for 29.76. JamesMC2K15, you lost by 5.68 with 29.48 points stranded on your own sideline — that's not bad luck, that's a lineup-construction crime scene.

JamesMC2K15 left 29.48 on the bench (74% of ceiling) · Teamwnoname left 33.38 on the bench (73% of ceiling)

SounDawg
142.08
omar93
139.78
Nail-Biter

SounDawg escaped with the week's narrowest win, 142.08 to 139.78, a margin so thin it needed its own Nail Biter trophy. Omar93 deserved better — an 8-3-0 all-play record makes this the league's official Hard-Luck Loser, and the 44.90 points left rotting on their bench (a brutal 75.7% bench efficiency) is the real crime here, not the 2.30-point final margin. SounDawg played nearly perfect at 99.3% efficiency and still almost blew it — that's how thin the margin for error was.

SounDawg left 1.00 on the bench (99% of ceiling) · omar93 left 44.90 on the bench (76% of ceiling)

StableSlinky cruised past Liquid369, 135.02 to 66.22, a 68.8-point beatdown that never felt in doubt. Liquid369 actually managed better bench efficiency at 89.3% than the winner's 85.8%, which just proves optimizing a lineup for a loss is the fantasy equivalent of rearranging deck chairs. StableSlinky left 22.36 points on the bench in a blowout win — sloppy, but when you're up by 68, nobody's grading the paper.

StableSlinky left 22.36 on the bench (86% of ceiling) · Liquid369 left 7.96 on the bench (89% of ceiling)

djritzjr93 dropped the week's highest score, 160.82, and did it with a perfect 100% bench efficiency — literally nothing left to complain about. That performance rocketed them ten spots up the power rankings to number two, the single biggest riser in the league this week. Mission909 was the collateral damage, scoring just 64 while leaving a staggering 29.30 points on the bench at a putrid 68.6% efficiency, and now sits as this week's biggest faller, dropping eight spots to tenth.

djritzjr93 left 0.00 on the bench (100% of ceiling) · mission909 left 29.30 on the bench (69% of ceiling)

Hydrocarbon moved to a perfect 4-0 with a workmanlike 131.68 to 121.66 win over sauceking32, who now sits winless at 0-4 despite a points-for total that would make plenty of teams jealous. Both squads left real production on the bench — 13.70 for Hydrocarbon, 20.26 for sauceking32 — proving nobody in this one was actually optimized, they just happened to have the better floor. Sauceking32, at some point 243.98 points-for with zero wins stops being bad luck and starts being a pattern worth investigating.

Hydrocarbon left 13.70 on the bench (91% of ceiling) · sauceking32 left 20.26 on the bench (86% of ceiling)

Power Rankings

Rank trajectory through this week, best at the top — same rankings as the Power Rankings page.

Power ranking trajectory through week 2Weekly power rank for 12 managers. Rank 1 is best and is drawn at the top.1471012RankW1W2SounDawg (Rank 6)SounDawgJamesMC2K15 (Rank 7)JamesMC2K15omar93 (Rank 8)omar93Teamwnoname (Rank 9)Teamwnonamemission909 (Rank 10)mission909Liquid369 (Rank 11)Liquid369huntington26 (Rank 12)huntington26DJGG (Rank 1)DJGGdjritzjr93 (Rank 2)djritzjr93Hydrocarbon (Rank 3)HydrocarbonStableSlinky (Rank 4)StableSlinkysauceking32 (Rank 5)sauceking32
Power ranking trajectory through week 2
ManagerW1W2
DJGG41
djritzjr93122
Hydrocarbon63
StableSlinky84
sauceking3275
SounDawg116
JamesMC2K1517
omar93108
Teamwnoname39
mission909210
Liquid369511
huntington26912

DJGG and Hydrocarbon sit tied atop the standings at 4-0, but DJGG's 287.70 points-for gives them the clear edge in a potential tiebreaker. Down in the basement, sauceking32 and huntington26 are both 0-4, but sauceking32's 243.98 points-for versus their non-existent win total is the more confusing tragedy of the two.

The Bottom Line

This week had everything: DJGG playing untouchable God-mode football, Teamwnoname backing into a win with an all-play record that should be embarrassing, and omar93 doing everything right statistically while still going home with an L. Mission909's freefall from grace was brutal to watch, and sauceking32 remains the league's most confusing team, racking up points-for numbers that just don't translate into actual wins. djritzjr93's perfect-efficiency masterpiece deserves a standing ovation, and huntington26 deserves a moment of silence. Next week, somebody needs to explain to Teamwnoname how you go 4-7 in all-play and still cash a winning ticket — until then, keep an eye on that bench, because apparently that's where the real games are being played.

Stat Sheet Behind This Recap
{
  "leagueName": "HaiKhuu",
  "seasonYear": "2026",
  "week": 2,
  "matchups": [
    {
      "index": 0,
      "winner": {
        "name": "DJGG",
        "points": 158.24,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_1",
        "participantId": "470320515702059008"
      },
      "loser": {
        "name": "huntington26",
        "points": 54.56,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_11",
        "participantId": "1131667149115871232"
      },
      "isTie": false,
      "margin": 103.68,
      "team1": {
        "name": "DJGG",
        "points": 158.24,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_1",
        "participantId": "470320515702059008"
      },
      "team2": {
        "name": "huntington26",
        "points": 54.56,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_11",
        "participantId": "1131667149115871232"
      },
      "tag": "blowout",
      "leftOnBench": {
        "team1": 0.9799999999999898,
        "team2": 10
      },
      "benchEfficiencyPct": {
        "team1": 0.9938449943474439,
        "team2": 0.8451053283767038
      }
    },
    {
      "index": 1,
      "winner": {
        "name": "Teamwnoname",
        "points": 89.38,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_6",
        "participantId": "78884179164938240"
      },
      "loser": {
        "name": "JamesMC2K15",
        "points": 83.7,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_2",
        "participantId": "720706311737634816"
      },
      "isTie": false,
      "margin": 5.68,
      "team1": {
        "name": "JamesMC2K15",
        "points": 83.7,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_2",
        "participantId": "720706311737634816"
      },
      "team2": {
        "name": "Teamwnoname",
        "points": 89.38,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_6",
        "participantId": "78884179164938240"
      },
      "tag": "lucky-win",
      "leftOnBench": {
        "team1": 29.47999999999999,
        "team2": 33.38000000000001
      },
      "benchEfficiencyPct": {
        "team1": 0.7395299522883902,
        "team2": 0.7280873248615184
      }
    },
    {
      "index": 2,
      "winner": {
        "name": "SounDawg",
        "points": 142.08,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_3",
        "participantId": "77940219479212032"
      },
      "loser": {
        "name": "omar93",
        "points": 139.78,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_7",
        "participantId": "858793905100042240"
      },
      "isTie": false,
      "margin": 2.3,
      "team1": {
        "name": "SounDawg",
        "points": 142.08,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_3",
        "participantId": "77940219479212032"
      },
      "team2": {
        "name": "omar93",
        "points": 139.78,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_7",
        "participantId": "858793905100042240"
      },
      "tag": "nail-biter",
      "leftOnBench": {
        "team1": 1.0000000000000284,
        "team2": 44.900000000000034
      },
      "benchEfficiencyPct": {
        "team1": 0.9930109029913333,
        "team2": 0.7568767598007363
      }
    },
    {
      "index": 3,
      "winner": {
        "name": "StableSlinky",
        "points": 135.02,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_4",
        "participantId": "984900303780675584"
      },
      "loser": {
        "name": "Liquid369",
        "points": 66.22,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_8",
        "participantId": "868586067564171264"
      },
      "isTie": false,
      "margin": 68.8,
      "team1": {
        "name": "StableSlinky",
        "points": 135.02,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_4",
        "participantId": "984900303780675584"
      },
      "team2": {
        "name": "Liquid369",
        "points": 66.22,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_8",
        "participantId": "868586067564171264"
      },
      "tag": "standard",
      "leftOnBench": {
        "team1": 22.359999999999985,
        "team2": 7.959999999999994
      },
      "benchEfficiencyPct": {
        "team1": 0.8579234972677596,
        "team2": 0.8926934483688327
      }
    },
    {
      "index": 4,
      "winner": {
        "name": "djritzjr93",
        "points": 160.82,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_5",
        "participantId": "722897393414119424"
      },
      "loser": {
        "name": "mission909",
        "points": 64,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_9",
        "participantId": "722890685748973568"
      },
      "isTie": false,
      "margin": 96.82,
      "team1": {
        "name": "djritzjr93",
        "points": 160.82,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_5",
        "participantId": "722897393414119424"
      },
      "team2": {
        "name": "mission909",
        "points": 64,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_9",
        "participantId": "722890685748973568"
      },
      "tag": "standard",
      "leftOnBench": {
        "team1": 0,
        "team2": 29.299999999999997
      },
      "benchEfficiencyPct": {
        "team1": 1,
        "team2": 0.6859592711682744
      }
    },
    {
      "index": 5,
      "winner": {
        "name": "Hydrocarbon",
        "points": 131.68,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_10",
        "participantId": "720706245534785536"
      },
      "loser": {
        "name": "sauceking32",
        "points": 121.66,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_12",
        "participantId": "1130591074575237120"
      },
      "isTie": false,
      "margin": 10.02,
      "team1": {
        "name": "Hydrocarbon",
        "points": 131.68,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_10",
        "participantId": "720706245534785536"
      },
      "team2": {
        "name": "sauceking32",
        "points": 121.66,
        "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_12",
        "participantId": "1130591074575237120"
      },
      "tag": "standard",
      "leftOnBench": {
        "team1": 13.699999999999989,
        "team2": 20.259999999999977
      },
      "benchEfficiencyPct": {
        "team1": 0.9057642041546293,
        "team2": 0.8572435174746338
      }
    }
  ],
  "superlatives": {
    "highestScore": {
      "name": "djritzjr93",
      "points": 160.82,
      "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_5",
      "participantId": "722897393414119424"
    },
    "lowestScore": {
      "name": "huntington26",
      "points": 54.56,
      "seasonTeamId": "1389029264900251648_11",
      "participantId": "1131667149115871232"
    },
    "biggestBlowout": {
      "winner": "DJGG",
      "loser": "huntington26",
      "margin": 103.68
    },
    "narrowestWin": {
      "winner": "SounDawg",
      "loser": "omar93",
      "margin": 2.3
    }
  },
  "luck": [
    {
      "name": "Teamwnoname",
      "isLuckyWin": true,
      "isUnluckyLoss": false,
      "allPlayRecord": "4-7-0"
    },
    {
      "name": "omar93",
      "isLuckyWin": false,
      "isUnluckyLoss": true,
      "allPlayRecord": "8-3-0"
    }
  ],
  "standings": [
    {
      "rank": 1,
      "name": "DJGG",
      "participantId": "470320515702059008",
      "record": "4-0-0",
      "pointsFor": 287.7
    },
    {
      "rank": 2,
      "name": "Hydrocarbon",
      "participantId": "720706245534785536",
      "record": "4-0-0",
      "pointsFor": 254.64
    },
    {
      "rank": 3,
      "name": "Teamwnoname",
      "participantId": "78884179164938240",
      "record": "3-1-0",
      "pointsFor": 226.54
    },
    {
      "rank": 4,
      "name": "djritzjr93",
      "participantId": "722897393414119424",
      "record": "2-2-0",
      "pointsFor": 255.78
    },
    {
      "rank": 5,
      "name": "StableSlinky",
      "participantId": "984900303780675584",
      "record": "2-2-0",
      "pointsFor": 249.74
    },
    {
      "rank": 6,
      "name": "SounDawg",
      "participantId": "77940219479212032",
      "record": "2-2-0",
      "pointsFor": 242.38
    },
    {
      "rank": 7,
      "name": "JamesMC2K15",
      "participantId": "720706311737634816",
      "record": "2-2-0",
      "pointsFor": 235.7
    },
    {
      "rank": 8,
      "name": "mission909",
      "participantId": "722890685748973568",
      "record": "2-2-0",
      "pointsFor": 206
    },
    {
      "rank": 9,
      "name": "Liquid369",
      "participantId": "868586067564171264",
      "record": "2-2-0",
      "pointsFor": 191.48
    },
    {
      "rank": 10,
      "name": "omar93",
      "participantId": "858793905100042240",
      "record": "1-3-0",
      "pointsFor": 241.74
    },
    {
      "rank": 11,
      "name": "sauceking32",
      "participantId": "1130591074575237120",
      "record": "0-4-0",
      "pointsFor": 243.98
    },
    {
      "rank": 12,
      "name": "huntington26",
      "participantId": "1131667149115871232",
      "record": "0-4-0",
      "pointsFor": 162.42
    }
  ],
  "awards": [
    {
      "name": "MVP of the Week",
      "recipient": "djritzjr93",
      "recipientId": "722897393414119424",
      "value": "160.82 pts",
      "description": "Highest scoring team this week",
      "icon": "champion"
    },
    {
      "name": "LVP of the Week",
      "recipient": "huntington26",
      "recipientId": "1131667149115871232",
      "value": "54.56 pts",
      "description": "Lowest scoring team this week",
      "icon": "trash"
    },
    {
      "name": "Blowout of the Week",
      "recipient": "DJGG",
      "recipientId": "470320515702059008",
      "value": "won by 103.68",
      "description": "Demolished huntington26",
      "icon": "blowout"
    },
    {
      "name": "Nail Biter",
      "recipient": "SounDawg",
      "recipientId": "77940219479212032",
      "value": "won by 2.30",
      "description": "Survived against omar93",
      "icon": "nervous"
    },
    {
      "name": "Overachiever",
      "recipient": "Teamwnoname",
      "recipientId": "78884179164938240",
      "value": "All-play: 4-7-0",
      "description": "Won their matchup despite a losing all-play record",
      "icon": "rocket"
    },
    {
      "name": "Hard-Luck Loser",
      "recipient": "omar93",
      "recipientId": "858793905100042240",
      "value": "All-play: 8-3-0",
      "description": "Lost their matchup despite a winning all-play record",
      "icon": "defiant"
    },
    {
      "name": "Boom",
      "recipient": "DJGG",
      "recipientId": "470320515702059008",
      "value": "42.50 pts from Jaxon Smith-Njigba",
      "description": "Highest individual player score this week",
      "icon": "rocket"
    },
    {
      "name": "Bust",
      "recipient": "Teamwnoname",
      "recipientId": "78884179164938240",
      "value": "-0.10 pts from DJ Moore",
      "description": "A starter who completely no-showed",
      "icon": "trend-down"
    },
    {
      "name": "Benchwarmer Hero",
      "recipient": "Teamwnoname",
      "recipientId": "78884179164938240",
      "value": "29.76 pts (Dak Prescott on bench)",
      "description": "Outscored a starter who put up -0.10 pts",
      "icon": "bench"
    }
  ],
  "powerMovers": {
    "biggestRiser": {
      "name": "djritzjr93",
      "participantId": "722897393414119424",
      "rankDelta": 10,
      "newRank": 2
    },
    "biggestFaller": {
      "name": "mission909",
      "participantId": "722890685748973568",
      "rankDelta": 8,
      "newRank": 10
    }
  }
}